Home Insurance in Arizona: What It Costs and What Actually Covers You

Not your state? Find your calculator here.

CalculatorByState EditorialUpdated 2026-08-2819 min read
A home exterior, the kind a homeowners policy protects
Photo by Rafael Hoyos Weht on Unsplash
Read the Cliff Notes
  • Arizona averages about $2,297 a year for $300,000 of dwelling coverage with a $1,000 deductible — the midpoint of Insurance.com's $2,397 and Insurify's $2,196, which agree unusually closely for this kind of data.
  • That sits roughly 20% to 25% below the national average of about $2,872 to $3,057. The reason is composition, not safety: Arizona's population is concentrated in low-wildfire-risk metro Phoenix and Tucson, which drags the statewide mean down and hides what high-country and wildland-urban-interface properties now cost.
  • A large and growing share of Arizona policies carry a SEPARATE wind-and-hail deductible, typically 1% to 2% of the dwelling limit, with 2%, 3% and 5% options and a $5,000 flat alternative at some carriers. At 2% on a $300,000 limit that is $6,000 out of pocket, against $1,000 for a kitchen fire.
  • That second deductible is carrier practice, not Arizona law. Arizona has no statute structuring catastrophe deductibles and is deliberately not on the Insurance Information Institute's hurricane/windstorm deductible list. A single flat deductible with no wind-hail split is still perfectly ordinary here — which is exactly why you have to read the declarations page instead of assuming.
  • Arizona has NO FAIR plan and no state-run insurer of last resort. It is absent from the roster of 33 states plus D.C. that operate one. The Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions points declined homeowners to surplus-lines carriers instead.
  • ADIFI has issued a mandatory homeowners wildfire data call requiring transaction-level reporting on all residential fire-covering policies in force in calendar years 2025 and 2026, including surplus lines — the kind of step that usually precedes a FAIR plan debate.
  • Arizona does not require replacement-cost roof settlement, and carriers increasingly attach actual-cash-value roof endorsements in hail and monsoon ZIP codes. On a 20-year roof with 15 years of service, an ACV schedule can pay as little as about 25% of replacement cost.
  • Rebuilding runs roughly $220 per square foot (a $160 to $280 band), so a 2,000 square foot Arizona home costs about $440,000 to rebuild — within $10,000 of the state's $448,407 median home price, which is a coincidence and not a reason to insure to market value.
  • Arizona premiums are projected up about 2% for 2026, roughly half the national +4% — a state whose loss pressure is real but geographically narrow.

Arizona is one of the more reassuring states on a home insurance rate table. The statewide average sits comfortably below the national figure, the year-over-year increase is running at half the national pace, and there is no hurricane in the picture. If you read only the summary row, Arizona looks like a solved market.

Two things are hiding underneath it.

The first is that the statewide average is essentially a Phoenix and Tucson average. Something like four out of five Arizonans live in those two metro areas, and neither carries meaningful wildfire exposure. That concentration pulls the statewide mean down and conceals how expensive — and in places, how unavailable — coverage has become in Rim Country and the rest of the wildland-urban interface.

The second is that Arizona has no insurer of last resort. No FAIR plan, no windstorm pool, nothing. Thirty-three states plus the District of Columbia operate one. Arizona is not among them. If your carrier non-renews you for wildfire exposure, the state's own insurance department will hand you a list of surplus-lines companies, and that is the entire backstop.

There is also a deductible question that most Arizona homeowners have never checked. This guide works through all of it: what the policy actually costs, which deductible applies to monsoon wind and hail damage, what a standard policy leaves out here, how to figure out whether your dwelling limit is anywhere near your rebuild cost, and what your options really are if nobody will write you. It is written for someone who has never read a policy front to back.

A note before you start: everything below is general information about how homeowners insurance works in Arizona, not personalized insurance, legal, or financial advice. Policy forms, rates, and underwriting rules vary by carrier and by your individual circumstances — county, elevation, wildfire risk score, ZIP-code hail history, construction type, roof age, and claims history all move the answer materially. For coverage specific to your property, talk to a licensed Arizona insurance agent; for regulatory questions, the Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions is the state authority.

1. What home insurance actually costs in Arizona

The reference figure is $2,297 a year for $300,000 of dwelling coverage with a $1,000 deductible.

"Dwelling coverage" — labeled Coverage A on your declarations page — is the maximum the policy will pay to repair or rebuild the structure of your home. It is the anchor number for the entire policy, and as Section 2 explains, it is also what any percentage deductible gets calculated from. The $300,000 tier is a standardized reference level so that states can be compared on the same basis. As Section 4 explains, it is probably not the right number for your house.

That $2,297 is the midpoint of two independent 2026 rate tables that both explicitly price $300,000 of dwelling coverage with a $1,000 deductible: Insurance.com puts Arizona at $2,397, and Insurify puts it at $2,196. The gap between them is under 10%, which is unusually tight — most states in this dataset show sources disagreeing by 15% to 30%. When two independently built rate tables land that close, the midpoint is worth more confidence than usual.

A third figure you may encounter, Forbes Advisor's $2,101, is deliberately not blended in. It is priced at $350,000 of dwelling coverage with a $500 deductible — richer coverage and a lower retention, a different package entirely. Comparing it to the numbers above is an apples-to-oranges exercise.

How Arizona compares, and why the comparison misleads

The same rate-table families put the national average at roughly $2,872 (Insurance.com) to $3,057 (Insurify) at that identical tier. Arizona therefore runs about 20% to 25% below national.

Read that carefully, because the obvious conclusion is the wrong one. Arizona is not cheap because Arizona is safe. Arizona is cheap on average because most Arizonans live in the safe part. Metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson carry very little wildfire exposure and only moderate hail exposure, and they hold the overwhelming majority of the state's housing stock. Averaging them together with Payson, Prescott, Show Low, Flagstaff, and the forested interface communities produces a statewide number that describes almost nobody's actual risk.

If you own a home in the wildland-urban interface, the statewide average tells you nothing useful about your renewal. If you own a stucco house in Chandler, it probably overstates what you pay. The dispersion around this mean is the story, and no published statewide figure captures it.

The trend

Insurify's 2026 price-projection model has Arizona moving from $2,104 in 2025 to a projected $2,142 by end-2026 — about +2%. The national projection in that same report is roughly +4%, so Arizona is running at half the national pace.

One methodological note worth carrying: that projection prices each state at its own average dwelling coverage rather than a fixed $300,000, so the dollar levels in it are not comparable to the $2,297 above. Only the percentage change transfers. The model is built from the historical relationship between a state's industry-wide loss ratios and subsequent rate movement — a measured recent trend, not a forecast this site endorses.

Half the national rate of increase is consistent with everything else about this state: the loss pressure is genuine but geographically narrow, and the large low-risk metro population dilutes it in every statewide statistic.

2. The deductible that actually applies to your most likely claim

This is the section to read twice, and it comes with a qualifier that most state guides would not bother to give you.

First, the honest framing

In Florida, a hurricane deductible is structured by statute and applies to essentially every residential policy in the state. In Arizona, nothing like that exists. Arizona has no statute mandating or structuring a catastrophe deductible, and Arizona is deliberately absent from the Insurance Information Institute's list of states using hurricane or windstorm deductibles.

What Arizona has instead is a monsoon season — June 15 to September 30 — that reliably produces damaging straight-line wind, blowing dust, and hail. Carriers have responded on their own, by writing a separate wind-and-hail deductible into Arizona homeowners policies.

So the deductible below is real, it is in the market, and it is spreading. But it rests on filed carrier products rather than on law, and it is not universal. It concentrates in ZIP codes with hail and monsoon loss history. A single flat deductible with no wind-hail split is still perfectly ordinary in much of the state.

That distinction has a practical consequence: an Arizona homeowner cannot assume either structure. You have to read the declarations page. In a statutory state, you can tell someone what their policy says. Here, you can only tell them what to go look for.

What the second deductible looks like when it is there

Where the separate wind-and-hail deductible appears, it is typically 1% to 2% of the dwelling limit, with 2%, 3% and 5% options offered and a $5,000 flat alternative at some carriers. One structural rule shows up consistently in Arizona filings: the wind/hail deductible is generally required to be equal to or greater than the all-other-perils deductible. It can never be the cheaper of the two.

On a $300,000 dwelling limit:

  • 1% = $3,000
  • 2% = $6,000
  • 3% = $9,000
  • 5% = $15,000

Section 4 works out that a 2,000 square foot Arizona home costs roughly $440,000 to rebuild. On a $440,000 dwelling limit the same percentages become:

  • 1% = $4,400
  • 2% = $8,800
  • 3% = $13,200
  • 5% = $17,600

Against a $1,000 all-other-perils deductible sitting on the same page.

The trap: the percentage is of your coverage, not your damage

This catches people everywhere percentage deductibles exist. The percentage applies to the insured value of the dwelling, not to the size of the loss. A 2% deductible on a $440,000 dwelling limit is $8,800 whether the hailstorm did $10,000 of damage or $300,000 of damage. It is not "2% of the claim."

Which means moderate monsoon claims can be worth close to nothing. A hailstorm that does $11,000 of damage to a home with a $440,000 limit and a 2% wind/hail deductible pays you $2,200. At 3% it pays nothing at all, and you have a hail claim on your record for the privilege of finding that out.

That last point matters more in Arizona than in most states, because of Section 6. In a state with no residual market, a claims record that makes you unattractive to the admitted market has nowhere good to send you.

What to actually do about it

Three specific things, in order:

  1. Pull your declarations page and look for two deductibles, not one. You are looking for a line reading "windstorm or hail," "wind/hail," or any percentage where you expected a dollar figure. If you find only a single flat all-perils deductible, that is a legitimate Arizona policy structure and you are fine — but confirm it rather than assume it.
  2. If there is a percentage, multiply it out against your dwelling limit and write the dollar number down. The whole failure mode here is homeowners discovering what 2% means in September rather than in March.
  3. Ask whether the percentage runs off the Coverage A dwelling limit or off total insured value. The base matters as much as the percentage, and carriers do it both ways.

A note on the 2% used throughout this guide: it is the prevailing middle of the 1%-to-2% range Arizona carriers write, not a measured Arizona mode. No source publishes an Arizona-specific distribution of deductible selections. Your policy may well read 1%, 3%, or a flat $5,000. Look it up.

3. What a standard policy covers here — and the gaps

A homeowners policy is a bundle of separate coverages:

  • Coverage A — Dwelling. The structure itself.
  • Coverage B — Other Structures. Detached garage, casita, block wall, shed, pool equipment enclosure. Usually about 10% of Coverage A automatically.
  • Coverage C — Personal Property. Your belongings, usually 50% to 70% of Coverage A.
  • Coverage D — Loss of Use. What it costs to live elsewhere during repairs. In a post-wildfire evacuation, when an entire community is displaced at once and rental supply vanishes, this coverage gets tested hard.

Covered perils typically include fire, lightning, windstorm, hail, theft, vandalism, and sudden accidental water discharge from plumbing.

Wildfire is covered. This is the single most important thing for an Arizona reader to know, and it surprises people who have absorbed the California headlines. Fire is a named peril on a standard homeowners policy, and wildfire is fire. The Arizona wildfire problem is not a coverage problem. It is an availability problem — whether a carrier will write you at all, and at what price. That is Section 6.

Flood is never covered — anywhere, by anyone's homeowners policy

This is universal across all fifty states, not an Arizona rule. No homeowners policy covers flood. Flood coverage is a separate purchase through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) or a private flood carrier.

Arizona homeowners dismiss this more readily than almost anyone, and it is the most expensive mistake in this guide. Arizona's flood exposure is real and specific:

  • Monsoon flash flooding. Sun-baked desert soil sheds water rather than absorbing it. Washes that are dry 360 days a year run several feet deep in twenty minutes.
  • Post-burn-scar flooding. This is the Arizona pattern that catches people. A wildfire strips vegetation from a watershed, and for years afterward the burn scar produces debris flows and flooding from rainfall that would previously have been unremarkable. Homes miles from any fire, and well outside any mapped flood zone, get hit.

Being outside a mapped high-risk flood zone is a statement about a flood map, not about whether your house can flood — a meaningful share of NFIP claims nationally come from outside high-risk zones. In moderate-risk zones, NFIP premiums are frequently far lower than people assume. Get the quote before deciding.

Earth movement is excluded too

Standard homeowners policies exclude earth movement — earthquake, landslide, subsidence, and sinking. In most states this is a footnote. In Arizona it deserves a sentence of its own, because parts of the state have documented land subsidence and earth fissures associated with long-term groundwater withdrawal, particularly in portions of Pinal, Maricopa, and Cochise counties. The Arizona Geological Survey maps them publicly. A house damaged by a fissure is dealing with an excluded peril, and there is no routine endorsement that fixes it. If you are buying in an area where fissures are mapped, that is a due-diligence item before closing, not an insurance item after.

Other standard exclusions worth knowing

  • Maintenance and wear. Insurance covers sudden accidental damage, not deterioration. Arizona's UV exposure and thermal cycling are brutal on roofing materials, and a claim for something that failed gradually will be denied as wear.
  • Ordinance or law — the extra cost of rebuilding to current code rather than as originally built. On older Arizona housing this can be a large number, and it is especially relevant if your rebuild triggers current wildfire-hardening or defensible-space requirements. Usually available as an endorsement; ask for it by name.
  • Mold, beyond limited sublimits.

4. Making sure you have enough coverage

The most consequential number on your policy is your Coverage A limit, and the most common way it goes wrong is setting it to your home's market value or your mortgage balance.

Neither is right. Dwelling coverage should equal the cost to rebuild your home from the foundation up at today's construction prices. Market value includes land, which does not burn. Your mortgage balance is a financing number with no relationship to construction cost.

Working a real Arizona example

Rebuilding in Arizona runs roughly $220 per square foot — the midpoint of a published $160 to $280 band covering materials, labor, and general contractor overhead and profit, excluding land.

On a 2,000 square foot home:

  • 2,000 x $220 = $440,000 to rebuild

Take the band seriously rather than the midpoint:

  • At $160/sq ft: $320,000
  • At $280/sq ft: $560,000

That is a $240,000 spread on the same house, and it is not resolvable from published data. The band Arizona sits in is shared with Colorado, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota — which tells you plainly that it is a regional construction-cost band applied to Arizona, not an Arizona-specific survey. No Arizona building department or insurance regulator publishes a competing rebuild-cost figure to check it against. Treat $220 as a starting point and get an actual replacement-cost estimate for your specific home.

The coincidence worth not being fooled by

Arizona's median home price is about $448,407. The 2,000 square foot rebuild figure above is $440,000. Those are within $10,000 of each other, and that is a coincidence with no meaning whatsoever.

It is a dangerous coincidence, because it makes "just insure it for what it is worth" feel like it works. It does not. Market value and construction cost are different quantities that happen to be passing each other here. In a Scottsdale neighborhood where land is a large share of value, insuring to market value badly overinsures the structure. In a rural high-country parcel where land is cheap and building is expensive, it badly underinsures it. The fact that the two numbers coincide statewide tells you nothing about your lot.

The 80% coinsurance rule, and what a shortfall does to a partial claim

Most homeowners policies contain a coinsurance provision requiring you to insure the dwelling to at least 80% of its full replacement cost. Fall below that and the insurer does not merely cap your payout at your limit — it reduces every partial claim proportionally.

Work it on the example. Full replacement cost $440,000, so the 80% threshold is $352,000. Suppose you carry the $300,000 reference limit instead, and a monsoon storm does $100,000 of damage. Your limit is three times the loss, so it feels safe. It is not:

  • $300,000 carried / $352,000 required = 0.852
  • 0.852 x $100,000 = $85,227
  • Then subtract your deductible — $1,000 on an ordinary claim, or $6,000 if this ran through a 2% wind/hail deductible on the $300,000 limit
  • Net payment: roughly $79,227 to $84,227 on a $100,000 loss

You are $15,800 to $20,800 short on a claim well inside your policy limit, entirely because Coverage A was set too low. None of that is visible until you file.

Two endorsements worth asking about by name

  • Extended replacement cost — pays a stated percentage above your Coverage A limit (commonly 25% to 50%) when rebuilding costs more than expected. After a wildfire that destroys many homes at once, local contractor capacity and material prices spike simultaneously. This endorsement exists for exactly that scenario, and Arizona is a state where that scenario is not hypothetical.
  • Ordinance or law coverage — as above, covers the cost of rebuilding to current code.

5. Roof age, and why it decides your premium and your payout

Arizona does not require homeowners policies to settle roof claims at replacement cost. There is no state mandate, and both settlement bases are actively written in the Arizona market. That is why this site's Arizona data file records roof settlement as "varies" rather than a single value — roof age and ZIP code decide it here, not state law.

The distinction to look for: ACV versus RCV

  • Replacement cost value (RCV) pays what it costs to put a new roof on today.
  • Actual cash value (ACV) pays replacement cost minus depreciation for the roof's age.

The gap grows every year the roof ages. On a roof with a 20-year expected life and 15 years of service, an ACV schedule can pay as little as about 25% of replacement cost, depending on the depreciation table applied. Your deductible then comes off the top of even that reduced amount.

Replacement-cost settlement remains the default on newer roofs. What has changed is that Arizona carriers increasingly attach actual-cash-value roof endorsements — particularly in ZIP codes with elevated hail or monsoon loss history. These get added at renewal, on policies that are still marketed and understood as replacement-cost policies.

Now stack the two Arizona mechanisms together

This is where an Arizona hail claim goes badly wrong, and it takes both halves of this guide to see it:

A 15-year-old roof on a $440,000 home takes $30,000 of monsoon hail damage. The policy carries a 2% wind/hail deductible and an ACV roof endorsement.

  • Depreciation first: roughly 25% of $30,000 = $7,500 of recognized value
  • Minus the 2% wind/hail deductible on $440,000 = $8,800
  • The insurer owes you nothing. You have a $30,000 roof, a covered peril, an in-force policy, and a zero-dollar claim.

That is not an edge case. That is two ordinary Arizona policy features interacting exactly as written. It is the single strongest argument for reading your declarations page before monsoon season rather than after.

What to actually do

Pull your declarations page and look specifically for a "roof surfaces" endorsement, a windstorm-loss-to-roof schedule, or any actual cash value language applied specifically to the roof rather than to the policy generally. If you find one, ask your agent what replacement-cost roof settlement would cost, and get the number before assuming it is unaffordable. On an older roof it may not be offered at all — which is itself information.

Why roof condition also decides whether you get written

Roof age is a leading underwriting factor almost everywhere. In Arizona it is a gating factor in the high-risk ZIP codes, not just a pricing factor: an older roof can move you from "expensive" to "declined." If your roof is nearing the end of its life, replacing it before renewal is frequently the difference between a quote and a non-renewal notice. Impact-rated roofing materials commonly carry credits worth asking about item by item.

6. If no carrier will write you

Here is the honest answer, and it is not a good one.

Arizona operates no FAIR plan and no state-run insurer of last resort. This is a confirmed absence, not an unchecked field. Arizona does not appear on the roster of the 33 states plus the District of Columbia that run a FAIR plan or equivalent, nor on the Insurance Information Institute's table of FAIR plans, beach plans, and windstorm pools. Independent state-by-state trackers that verify against NAIC, Triple-I, and PIPSO membership record Arizona explicitly as having none.

A correction worth making explicitly: some secondary sources online assert that an "Arizona FAIR Plan" exists. It could not be verified against any regulator, NAIC, or PIPSO source, and those claims should be treated as inaccurate. If someone tells you to apply to the Arizona FAIR Plan, there is nothing to apply to.

Why this matters more here than in most no-FAIR-plan states

Plenty of states get by without a residual market because they have no concentrated catastrophe exposure. Arizona is not one of them. Homes in Rim Country and other wildland-urban interface areas are being non-renewed, and there is no state backstop for them. The gap between "your carrier dropped you" and "you have no options" is much shorter in Arizona than in a state with a FAIR plan.

What you actually get instead: surplus lines

The Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions points declined homeowners to its list of surplus-lines insurers. These are non-admitted carriers, and the differences are not cosmetic:

  • They are not subject to the same rate and form regulation as admitted carriers. The state does not review their rates or approve their policy language the same way.
  • They typically cost more — often substantially.
  • They frequently write stripped-down coverage. Actual-cash-value settlement rather than replacement cost is common, which, read against Section 5, means a surplus-lines policy on an older Arizona home may depreciate far more than the roof.
  • Guaranty fund protection generally does not extend to non-admitted carriers. In most states, if an admitted insurer becomes insolvent, a state guaranty association covers claims within limits. That protection typically does not apply to surplus-lines placements. If your surplus-lines carrier fails, you are an unsecured creditor.

Surplus lines is a real market that does real work, and for an interface property it may be the only market there is. It is not a FAIR plan equivalent, and it should not be described as one.

One thing on the horizon

Arizona's regulatory response so far has been data-gathering and mitigation rather than a residual market. ADIFI has issued a mandatory homeowners wildfire data call requiring transaction-level reporting on all residential fire-covering policies in force in calendar years 2025 and 2026, including surplus lines. That is a serious exercise — it produces the granular non-renewal and pricing picture a regulator needs before proposing anything structural, and it is the kind of step that has preceded FAIR plan debates elsewhere. It is worth rechecking this question in 2027. Today, the answer is that there is no backstop.

The practical instruction

Because there is no fallback, the defensive work matters more in Arizona than it does in a FAIR plan state. Defensible space, ember-resistant vents, Class A roofing, and removing vegetation within the immediate zone around the structure are underwriting inputs, not just fire-safety advice. In the interface, they are what keeps you in the admitted market. And if you are buying a high-country property, resolve insurance availability before you resolve financing — not after.

7. How to actually lower your premium in Arizona

Ranked roughly by how much they move the number in this state specifically.

1. Find out whether you have a wind/hail deductible, and choose it deliberately. This is the highest-value hour on the list because most Arizona homeowners do not know the answer. Once you know, the choice is a real trade: moving from 1% to 3% on a $440,000 limit lowers your premium and raises your monsoon exposure from $4,400 to $13,200. That is rational if you have $13,200 liquid and would genuinely spend it. It is a bad trade if you do not. Do the multiplication before you agree to a percentage.

2. Get your Coverage A limit right, in both directions. Because Arizona land values are high relative to construction costs in the metros, a meaningful number of Phoenix and Scottsdale homeowners are insured closer to market value than to rebuild cost and are simply overpaying. Others — especially on rural high-country parcels where land is cheap and building is not — are far under. Get an actual replacement-cost estimate. This is the rare adjustment that can lower your premium and improve your coverage.

3. Fix the roof before the renewal, not after the storm. In hail and monsoon ZIP codes this is the item with the largest combined effect: it can remove an ACV roof endorsement, lower your rate, and keep you out of a non-renewal. Ask specifically about credits for impact-rated roofing.

4. Do the wildfire mitigation work and then tell your carrier about it. Defensible space, ember-resistant vents, Class A roof, non-combustible siding, and clearing the five feet immediately around the structure. Carriers do not always discover this on their own — some now use aerial imagery and wildfire risk scores that lag reality by a year or more. If you have done the work, document it with dated photos and ask for a re-score. In interface ZIP codes this is frequently the difference between renewal and non-renewal, which is worth more than any discount.

5. Raise the all-other-perils deductible. Going from $1,000 to $2,500 lowers premium and only affects non-wind claims. Remember the Arizona structural rule from Section 2: the wind/hail deductible must be equal to or greater than the all-other-perils deductible, so raising the flat one can push the percentage one up with it. Ask what happens to both numbers before you agree.

6. Bundle home and auto. Multi-policy discounts remain among the largest routinely available, and in ZIP codes where carriers are thinning out, being a multi-policy customer helps on the underwriting side as well as the pricing side.

7. Stop filing small claims. This is more important in Arizona than in most states, precisely because of Section 6. With a $1,000 flat deductible and a wind/hail deductible in the thousands, most small losses are not worth claiming anyway — and claims frequency drives non-renewal. In a state with no residual market, a non-renewal costs you far more than the claim was worth. Paying a $2,500 repair yourself is often strictly better.

8. Buy flood coverage anyway. This raises your total spend rather than lowering it, and it belongs on the list because the cheapest possible premium is worthless if water did the damage. Monsoon flash flooding and post-burn-scar debris flows are the two Arizona scenarios where homeowners discover the gap. Get the NFIP quote — in moderate-risk zones it is often far less than people assume.

9. Re-shop every year, and compare the right four things. Line up: the premium, the dwelling limit, whether there is a separate wind/hail deductible and at what percentage, and whether the roof settles at ACV or replacement cost. A quote that beats yours on premium while quietly adding a 5% wind/hail deductible and an ACV roof endorsement is not a better quote. It is a worse policy with a better headline — the same mistake the statewide average makes, reproduced on your own declarations page.

What to do next

If you want these numbers applied to your actual house rather than a statewide average that is really a Phoenix average, the Arizona premium calculator estimates your annual cost from your own dwelling limit and deductible. The replacement cost calculator works out the Coverage A limit you actually need from your home's square footage using Arizona construction costs — worth running first, given how close the state's median home price and its rebuild cost happen to sit, and how misleading that coincidence is. And because the wind/hail percentage is the number that decides your real monsoon exposure, the deductible calculator converts 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5% into actual dollars against your specific dwelling limit.

All three show every figure they use and where it came from.


This guide is general information about homeowners insurance in Arizona, based on publicly available figures current as of August 2026. It is not an insurance quote, a policy, coverage advice, or legal advice, and it does not reflect your individual property, county, wildfire risk score, claims history, or carrier's specific policy language. Premiums, deductible structures, roof settlement terms, and underwriting rules vary substantially by carrier and by property, and the separate wind/hail deductible described here is carrier practice rather than Arizona law — it is present on many Arizona policies and absent from many others. For coverage specific to your home, speak with a licensed Arizona insurance agent; for regulatory questions or complaints, contact the Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions.

This article is general information, not financial, legal, or tax advice. See /methodology for how the figures cited here are sourced.